Titleist Cb Irons for sale

The list of what these irons have to deliver in the 718 CBs is much broader, since further tungsten weighting in the long and mid iron provides further impact stabilization and better launch conditions in the long and mid iron. New face inserts provide more impact ball speed, which in turn contributes to small yet useful distance gains. With their soft 1025 carbon steel forged structure, lightweight blade forms,

Titleist 620 CB

Titleist remains true to the spirit of its CB offering, as is the MB. In return for classic shaping, excellent feeling, and all of that workability and precision material, the 620 CB is indeed a single-piece forging built for the golfer willing to forgo any technology. That said, some tour players thought that there was a little overlap between the CB and the AP2, so Titleist nudged the 620 CB a bit to the better player side of the scale so that between the MB and T100 the score is focused.

It only makes sense. This time around, though in the 3 through 5 irons there is co-forged tungsten, that’s the end of it (the previous CB included tungsten from the 3 through 7-irons). Titleist was able to bring down ball flight by eliminating the tungsten, while increasing spin just a bit. It’s a structural improvement planned to serve golfers who choose to travel the ball from a lower window. The shape of the 620 CB has been optimized and turf interaction has been enhanced, as with anything else we’ve addressed today.

Titleist CB Irons Review

The 2010 Titleist CB irons are going to be famous, you have to imagine. I just spent a week evaluating the 1025 carbon steel forged iron that makes up a quarter of the current iron line of the company; I was overwhelmed with people calling for a closer look. It might have been the elegant chrome finish or the styling of the old world, but whatever the case, they gained interest from a wide variety of golfers. I had a deep respect for the look of these sticks before touching the iron as those many admirers did.

They draw quick contrast to the classic Titleist blade iron of the past with a lightweight head shape, mild cavity strengthened with a heavy weight pad, and slim soles. On closer glance, they mirrored just what I expected to see for this club category at the address (the money shot for many golfers). Not too long from heel to toe (shorter than the 2010 AP2), they can provide a measure for weaker ball strikers, but for those who like this presence, they seem to exude control. In the limited sum of offset they have, they received two other check marks for me (it varies from .15 “in the 2 iron down to .075” in the PW) and the top line in the long iron with a soft and thin look.

The true challenge came as I got to tee it up, with the looks still on their side. My research session consisted of one range outing in dry , warm temperatures, accompanied by 41 holes in varying periods of rainy, windy, and very cold weather over four courses. The first influence had sold me on their emotions. They are not as “buttery soft” as other irons, but with a good sound at contact, they strike a nice balance between hard and smooth. There is no jarring feeling about the heel and toe effect, with the latter offering the most negative vibration, if you can even term it that. They were lighter in feeling than the 2010 AP2 iron I checked them against with a more subdued tone than the iron given for game enhancement.

Striking balls in dry conditions from fairway, rough, and even divots was not really a challenge, but I had some questions about how the narrow sole could do in wet conditions. I am more of a sweeper, but I imagined that there could be some digging going on when forced into operation on damp turf with a minimal roll on the leading side. During my on-course period, where I faced golf courses completely flooded by inches of rainfall, that turned out not to be the case. I witnessed a few shots from wet lies that flew further than anticipated with the irons providing grooves that adhere to the 2010 Guidelines. Having grown up with V grooves, I adapted easily. In certain cases, there was plenty of spin to avoid the ball, but I would admit that the greens were smooth enough to tolerate most hits. To judge their true stopping ability, I would require more research on dry, firm greens.

Dynamic Golf S300 shafts were fitted into the stock clubs, one of many choices (see link to custom options below). On both clubs, the line was comfortable, not overly strong, except in the short irons. Long iron irons seem to have enough low mass to allow me comfortably drive them as high as required. In winds up to 30 mph, playing knockdown shots even resulted in rather favorable outcomes. Working the ball in either direction was also easily achieved. I’m going to claim these irons are ideally designed for experienced ball hitters to be higher than average. The latest AP2 is undoubtedly more humane and encourages the player to maintain a high trajectory even under the toughest conditions.

Other than getting difficult rivalry with the latest AP2 in the Titleist family, there is not much bad to tell regarding these irons. They would undoubtedly enjoy the stronger player because they deliver perfectly in a variety of ways. Normal ball strikers will fail with them and potentially score them at best with a 7-8, but they are similar to a 10 for the player searching for a refined iron that still offers some scope for a miss-strike or two. Golfers will find that the form of these irons is smoother than the Titleist 695CB with a shorter blade and less progression from the heel to the toe in blade height. The toe is more rounded and over the 695CBs the decreased offset in the latest CB’s is very clear. With these, Titleist has got it right. It’s definitely the finest forged back cavity they’ve ever offered.


In the 620 CB, without going too far from what this club is intended to be, Titleist walks the thin line of allowing efficiency changes. In terms of what’s fresh, players will note that the offset has been marginally decreased, which can slightly decrease the launch and make it simpler for the ball to fade. This collection often has incremental lengths of the blade, such that the long irons are wider while the short irons are shorter.

This is not only aesthetic: in order to boost durability, Titleist has placed tungsten in the 3I and 4I Although these improvements would be essential to the player with a trained eye, the basics of this club remain unchanged. The 620 CB is a typical iron for players that stresses shot regulation over forgiving. While the CB is significantly simpler to strike than the MB, this is not the club for players who use every inch of the club face.

As I stated in my 620 MB analysis, all the CB and MB specifications are the same-loft, lie, and weight. This makes bringing together a combo package of the two versions really simple. For at least the long irons, even the most experienced ball strikers can think long and hard about utilizing the CBs.

In terms of viability and shot variety, the 718 CB has a number of efficiency comparisons to the MB. It is with the feeling and suggestions that I see the biggest discrepancies come into effect. The CB is a little less sensitive than the MB, though still very reliable. In my situation, I find it far simpler to play the long irons to hold them under pressure. I always had the power to mold my attempts, but I had to fire the ball faster. For shorter irons, I would always recommend the MB, but the CB was a far better choice for me in 3 through 6.


For the remainder of Titleist ‘s lineup, except the bells and whistles. Two of the cleanest and most conventional blade irons on the market are the 718 MB and CB irons. If you’re searching for a classic blade like the MB, or even identical playing features with some forgiveness like the CB, then the Titleist 718 MB and CB iron should surely be in the discussion. Nice feeling, traditional looks, and workability are main characteristics of each Titleist MB and CB iron generation, and there is no exception to the 718 models.